Staphylococcus aureus type I signal peptidase: essential or not essential, that’s the question

–

Staphylococcus aureus is an important human pathogen that can cause life-threatening invasive infections, such as bacteremia, endocarditis, pneumonia, and osteomyelitis. Because of its nominal essentiality, Type I signal peptidase (SPase I) has been investigated as a potential antibacterial target. Several factors make S. aureus SpsB an attractive antibiotic target [1]. First, the enzymatic domain, consisting of the serine-lysine dyad, is unique to prokaryotes and is druggable; inhibitors of the enzyme have been described previously in the literature [1]. Second, the extracellular location of the enzymatic pocket makes this target relatively accessible as it obviates the requirement of the inhibitor to traverse the bacterial membrane. Recently, derivatives of the arylomycin family of SpsB inhibitors with enhanced potency against S. aureus have been generated [2][3].

–

A surprising observation from resistance studies performed by our group and others is that mutations in the locus encoding for the putative transcriptional regulator cro/cI confer resistance to arylomycin-derived SpsB inhibitors in S. aureus [3][4]. The Cro/CI protein shares sequence similarity with lambda phage Cro, and has transcriptional repressor activity in S. aureus [3]. Loss-of-function mutations in the cro/cI locus are associated with over-expression of the 3-gene locus immediately downstream of cro/cI which encodes a putative ABC transporter [3][5] (see Figure 1A). Over-expression of the ABC transporter is sufficient to confer resistance to SpsB inhibitors, whereas over-expression of the transporter with an inactivated ATPase domain is not [3]. This suggests that this resistance mechanism is ATP-dependent and possibly mediated by active transport [3]. Over-expression of the ABC transporter overcomes the S. aureus lethality caused by either pharmacologic inhibition or genetic ablation of SpsB, and is associated with secretion of alternatively cleaved proteins [3][5] (see Figure 2 for a model). Thus, over-expression of the putative ABC transporter is both necessary and sufficient to compensate for the essentiality of S. aureus SpsB in vitro. Together these findings introduce a new concept, which challenges the common belief that SpsB is absolutely essential for viability, and which invites a number of interesting questions.

FIGURE 1: Genomic organization of the operon of the Cro/CI and ABC trans-porter operon in Staphylococcus. (A) Functional model for the operon in S. aureus. The S. aureus cro/cI gene is a homolog of the lambda phage transcriptional repressor cro, and shares an operon with three genes encoding a putative ABC transporter (abbreviated as ABC1, ABC2, and ABC3). S. aureus Cro/CI functions as a transcriptional regulator, suppressing transcription of all four operon genes. The putative binding site of the Cro/CI protein presumably lies just upstream of the cro/cI gene in its promoter area. Mutations in cro/cI lead to 40~100 fold over-expression of the putative ABC transporter, causing resistance to arylomycin derivatives. Genes and promoter area are not drawn to scale. For more details see reference [3]. (B) Schematic showing the genomic organization of the cro/cI - ABC transporter operon in selected pathogenic Staphylococcus genomes. The intact operon is well conserved in these staphylococci. Exceptions are the lack of ABC2 and ABC3 encoding genes in 2 of 5 S. epidermidis genomes, and an ~15 kb insertion between ABC2 and ABC3 in 7 of 124 S. aureus genomes. The phyletic distribution of cro/cI and the ABC transporter genes was determined using BLAST+ [6]. The maximum-likelihood (RAxML [7], GTRGAMMA) phylogeny was constructed on the basis of a concatenated core genome alignment generated using Mugsy [8]. Nodes with ≥ 95% bootstrap support from 1,000 replicates are indicated by black diamonds. Present genes are dark gray, absent genes are white with a dotted outline, and the insertion is black. In parentheses are the numbers of S. aureus strains of the total examined that share the genomic organization of the representative strains shown.

First, to what extent does the putative ABC transporter compensate for the absence of functional SpsB? Proteomic studies of the secretome of a wild-type S. aureus strain and an S. aureus strain that lacks SpsB while over-expressing the ABC transporter show that only a minor subset of proteins that are normally SpsB-cleavable is alternatively secreted [3][5]. These proteins, which are secreted independently of SpsB, are cleaved at a site N-terminal to the canonical SpsB-cleavage site [3]. Given that the ABC transporter does not encode any domain that resembles a protease, it is feasible that one of its substrates posesses the proteolytic activity responsible for this alternative cleavage.

–

The observation that the alternative cleavage occurs N-terminal of the SpsB cleavage site suggests the involvement of a membrane-localized protease. Although the strain lacking SpsB and over-expressing the ABC transporter appears to grow well in vitro, it is unable to establish infection in a mouse model [3]. Pharmocological inhibition of SpsB has been shown to reduce secretion of several S. aureus virulence factors [6]. Notably, when SpsB expression is genetically disrupted, over-expression of the ABC transporter is not able to sufficiently restore secretion of several specific virulence factors known to contribute to establishment of infection, including adhesion molecules and secreted proteases [3]. Thus, the rather limited subset of proteins that are alternatively secreted through the ABC transporter in the absence of SpsB uncouples in vitro bacterial growth from in vivo infectivity. An interesting consideration that follows is that since S. aureus is a commensal of mammalian skin and nares [7], the strong conservation of SpsB may thus be a consequence of its essentiality for viability within these niches.

–

Second, by which mechanism does the alternative ABC transporter-mediated secretion pathway compensate for the essentiality of SpsB in vitro? To speculate on the answer, it would be relevant to understand the mechanism by which SpsB inhibition leads to bacterial death. Two main hypotheses, that are not mutually exclusive, can be proposed. First, in the absence of SpsB activity, cell death may be caused by accumulation of unprocessed proteins leading to disruption of membrane integrity. This hypothesis raises the possibility that the ABC transporter is directly or indirectly involved in removal of unprocessed proteins. It is possible that the transporter enables a hypothetical membrane-associated proteolytic enzyme to degrade these unprocessed membrane proteins. Second, under SpsB inhibitory conditions, cell death may occur because certain secreted proteins that are essential for viability cannot be secreted. In the context of this hyopothesis, it can be speculated that in the absence of SpsB, the ABC transporter enables secretion of an individual protein or a combination of proteins that is otherwise essential. Although such proteins have not been identified as yet, this possibility also cannot be excluded. Future experiments to elucidate the mechanism by which the ABC transporter compensates for the essentiality of SpsB should help address this question.

–

Third, what is the physiological role of the putative ABC transporter? Over-expression of the ABC transporter to overcome a loss of secretion may be a protective mechanism in a natural environment in which arylomycin-like antibacterials are present, and this could be relevant for niche competition. In this context, it is noteworthy that inactivation of the ABC transporter (in the absence of cro/cI mutations) renders S. aureus much more sensitive to treatment with an arylomycin-derived SpsB inhibitor in mice [3]. This raises the possibility that the natural function of the ABC transporter represents a phenotypic resistance mechanism, perhaps through its over-expression in response to arylomycin-like antibacterials present in the environment. This would be consistent with the observation that treatment with an arylomycin derivative transiently upregulates transcription of a homolog of the ABC transporter [4]. At present, it is unknown which transcriptional regulator may be involved in this phenotypic response, although cro/cI itself is a likely candidate. It is possible that cro/cI is part of an as yet to be defined signaling mechanism that senses the presence of arylomycin in a natural environment.

–

Fourth, is the Cro/CI – ABC transporter operon universally conserved in pathogenic Staphylococcus species? We find the operon is remarkably conserved in some but not all pathogenic staphylococci. Cro/cI and the three downstream genes encoding the ABC transporter proteins (in this paper referred to as ABC1, ABC2, and ABC3; Figure 1) are found as an intact collinear unit in 133 of 145 Staphylococcus genomes examined. However, the operon is disrupted in a subset of strains in at least two pathogenic staphylococcal species. First, in two S. epidermidis genomes, the genes encoding ABC2 and ABC3 are missing entirely (Figure 1B). The loss of these two genes likely reflects the lack of a functional ABC transporter, as each is essential for resistance of a S. aureus USA300 cro/cI mutant to SpsB inhibitors [3]. Second, in 7 of 124 S. aureus genomes analyzed, the operon has been interrupted by the obvious insertion of an ~15 kb transposable element between the ABC2 and ABC3 encoding genes (Figure 1B). While the gene encoding ABC3 in these strains may no longer be under the control of the cro/cI promoter, it is unclear whether it can still be expressed and whether an active ABC transporter can be formed. Thus, the operon is not universally intact in all Staphylococcus genomes; further experimental studies are needed to determine whether insertion of the transposable element in the cro/cI – ABC transporter operon inactivates SpsB-independent secretion.

FIGURE 2: Model for alternative secretion compensating for the lack of type I signal peptidase SpsB activity in S. aureus. (A) The most common route for proteins destined for secretion in-volves translocation across the S. aureus cell membrane through the general secretory (Sec) translocon, and subsequent cleavage by SpsB of the signal (or leader) peptide allowing release from the membrane. SpsB also cleaves the N-terminal signal peptides of proteins secreted through the Tat protein export system. (B) When SpsB is inhibited, these proteins are not cleaved and hence not secreted, causing accumulation of unprocessed proteins, and eventually resulting in cell death. (C) Over-expression of the putative ABC transporter (as in S. aureus with mutations in the transcriptional repressor cro/cI) compensates for a lack of SpsB activity. This transporter mediates SpsB-independent cleavage of a subset of proteins at an alternative cleavage site, leading to their secretion. This alternative secretion pathway is able to restore viability under conditions of either pharmacological SpsB inhibition (in which case it constitutes the main resistance mechanism) or genetic disruption of SpsB expression. For more details see reference [3].

In conclusion, the discovery of a potential new secretion system in S. aureus that is able to bypass the nominal essentiality of SpsB raises a number of interesting questions. Determining the molecular mechanism of this alternative secretion pathway has the potential to provide new insights into the basic biology of bacterial secretion and to aid design of new antibacterial therapies.

References

1. S. Rao C.V., E. De Waelheyns, A. Economou, and J. Anné, "Antibiotic targeting of the bacterial secretory pathway", Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1843, pp. 1762-1783, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.02.004
2. A.G. Therien, J.L. Huber, K.E. Wilson, P. Beaulieu, A. Caron, D. Claveau, K. Deschamps, R.G.K. Donald, A.M. Galgoci, M. Gallant, X. Gu, N.J. Kevin, J. Lafleur, P.S. Leavitt, C. Lebeau-Jacob, S.S. Lee, M.M. Lin, A.A. Michels, A.M. Ogawa, R.E. Painter, C.A. Parish, Y. Park, L. Benton-Perdomo, M. Petcu, J.W. Phillips, M.A. Powles, K.I. Skorey, J. Tam, C.M. Tan, K. Young, S. Wong, S.T. Waddell, and L. Miesel, "Broadening the Spectrum of β-Lactam Antibiotics through Inhibition of Signal Peptidase Type I", Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 56, pp. 4662-4670, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00726-12
3. J.H. Morisaki, P.A. Smith, S.V. Date, K.K. Kajihara, C.L. Truong, Z. Modrusan, D. Yan, J. Kang, M. Xu, I.M. Shah, R. Mintzer, E.M. Kofoed, T.K. Cheung, D. Arnott, M.F.T. Koehler, C.E. Heise, E.J. Brown, M. Tan, and W.L.W. Hazenbos, "A Putative Bacterial ABC Transporter Circumvents the Essentiality of Signal Peptidase", mBio, vol. 7, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00412-16
4. A. Craney, and F.E. Romesberg, "A Putative Cro-Like Repressor Contributes to Arylomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus", Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 59, pp. 3066-3074, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.04597-14
5. A. Craney, M.M. Dix, R. Adhikary, B.F. Cravatt, and F.E. Romesberg, "An Alternative Terminal Step of the General Secretory Pathway in Staphylococcus aureus", mBio, vol. 6, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01178-15
6. M.A. Schallenberger, S. Niessen, C. Shao, B.J. Fowler, and F.E. Romesberg, "Type I Signal Peptidase and Protein Secretion in Staphylococcus aureus", Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 194, pp. 2677-2686, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00064-12
7. H.F. Wertheim, D.C. Melles, M.C. Vos, W. van Leeuwen, A. van Belkum, H.A. Verbrugh, and J.L. Nouwen, "The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections", The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, pp. 751-762, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70295-4